Science & Spirituality
    Home
    2012
    Human evolution
    Science & spirituality
    Human spirit
    Join in
    Glossary
    About
    Blog
armillary
 

The relationship between science and spirituality is complex.
The two fields exchange useful ideas, but
argue about what proof is and the nature of truth.

  The relationship between science and spirituality is complex – but it’s not as hostile as the Galileo controversy and the creation/evolution debate make it seem.

Science offers spirituality new models of how the world works and new ways of seeing the world. A scientific model isn’t the truth about something: it’s a useful picture that explains the results we have and accurately predicts the results we’ll get. For example, light is a wave-particle. It’s actually neither or both, or something else altogether, but the model works. Ideas like light’s duality and quantum uncertainty excite our minds and give spirituality new approaches and metaphors. Of course it’s important to understand the model, to know when something is just a metaphor, and when it’s a total myth – which is part of what the blog will explore.

Spirituality offers science a safe haven for unproven ideas. Sometimes things work, but we don’t know why yet. An “operative fiction” is similar to a scientific model: it works (operative) but it’s not necessarily true (fiction). Believing you will get well, against all the scientific evidence, can improve your health – the placebo effect. The opposite is also true: the nocebo effect means you can die from being cursed or wrongly diagnosed with cancer.

Some ideas which spirituality and “old wives’ tales” kept safe have now been proven. The “superstitious” “unhygienic” practice of putting moldy bread on wounds, for example, was – of course – penicillin. Some are difficult to prove – for example, the idea that the full moon makes people crazy, “lunacy”. Despite massive anecdotal evidence, for years studies could find no link. Now, researchers have found a correlation with seizures, at least.

Of course, the two argue – mainly about how you know something is true. Science demands that a theory must be falsifiable: you must be able to test whether it’s true or not. On the other hand, spirituality questions whether the scientific method is effective for all things – what if that way of thinking actually stops something working?

  historical notions in science and spirituality
the “ether”
assumptions about science
reductive materialism
quantum physics
science interpretations
the big bang
Albert Einstein
the Church & Science
left brain / right brain
the heart brain
emotional intelligence

 

Did you know? The idea of the Butterfly Effect came from Edward Lorenz’s work on weather predictions in the 1960s. He discovered that the forecast changed totally with even the tiniest change to one number – a difference of only 0.000127! A mere flap of a butterfly’s wing. The idea is used in chaos theory, quantum physics, and any system where the smallest change to starting conditions can have a huge effect.